Decolonizing Male Psychosexual Therapy
An Interoceptive, Ericksonian, and Transpersonal Framework
By Joseph Randolph (Jorandi) Bowers PhD (they/them)
man in plaid shirt and trousers sitting lotus on a stone in a river with natural grasses and bush around
Section 1: Historiography & Evolutionary Foundations of Male Sexual Function and Expression
Contemporary clinical sexology routinely operates within a narrow chronological and conceptual window. By framing male sexual function primarily through late 20th-century diagnostic taxonomy, the discipline frequently mistakes culturally conditioned performance expectations for universal human biology (Bowers 2020; Tiefer, 2004; Waldinger, 2014).
This paper examines not only these wider implications of the truncated theory and practice models in clinical sexology, but also decodes the heteronormative assumptions that warrant serious critique and reframing. Men’s sexual health and relational wellness is a holistic and expansive field of potential - to reduce such a beautiful ecology to such limited and mechanical diagnostic criteria is absurd and counterproductive to men seeking therapy and to society seeking pathways toward healing of western macro-cultural limitations.
Key point:
To construct an affirmative, growth-oriented framework for male psychosexual wellness, we must first locate male physiological responses—specifically ejaculatory latency and orgasmic expression—within their broader evolutionary and socio-historical trajectories.
In mainstream diagnostic literature, rapid ejaculation is categorized as a primary dysfunction characterized by a lack of control and insufficient intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (Althof, 2020; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2022). The definitions are not only heteronormative and highly performative, but also ignore many key factors within human physiology and socio-psychology. We will explore these issues as we travel - for now take a moment to examine the evidence…
Central to the discussion, when evaluated through the lens of evolutionary biology and comparative mammalian physiology, the rapid transmission of genetic material emerges not as a physiological deficit, but as a highly conserved, adaptive evolutionary mechanism (Gallup et al., 2016; Waldinger, 2007). Plainly states, our ancestors copulated under often extreme conditions of survival - and this established an evolutionary trend toward rapid transmission of genetic material for reproduction of the species. A normal physiological response translated into the autonomic nervous system.
Across the mammalian kingdom, copulation represents a window of acute physical vulnerability. In natural environments, prolonged sexual activity exposes both partners to predation, territorial rivalry, and environmental hazards (Barash & Lipton, 2002). Consequently, natural selection favored physiological architectures that optimized reproductive efficiency while minimizing exposure time.
The Heteronormative Mistake Cecoded
Whether you render this historical trend as heteronormative or not, my understanding is that diversity within evolutionary biology has always existed. In my study of the science over the past 30+ years, I am convinced that diversity in psychosexual evolution is integral to the landscape of humanity’s history, present realities, and future.
In terms of women’s and men’s and non-binary health, this means that a healthy lifestyle model of human sexual and gender diversity is normative. All discussion of health and human rights follows from this normative baseline where diversity is central to humanity.
Hence, the theory of gender and sexological evolution integrates diversity awareness. It is entirely reasonable that same gender copulation and other and diverse forms of sexual and interpersonal intimacy followed along similar evolutionary tracks. Survival is always paramount. The body’s evolving systems adapted to these contexts, and provided rather astounding resonant chambers for diverse expressions in sexual and communicative intimacy.
Physiological Evolutionary Trends in Sexual Health
The ejaculatory reflex is governed by a spinal generator that responds rapidly to sympathetic nervous system activation (Coolen et al., 2004). In ancestral conditions, acute arousal naturally co-occurred with heightened sympathetic tone, ensuring swift fertilization before potential environmental interruptions. Evolutionary pressures prioritize the successful transmission of genetic material, not extended coital duration (Gallup et al., 2016).
The physiological reflex to ejaculate swiftly under conditions of novel erotic stimulation or high autonomic arousal served as a survival vector for the species. The contemporary pathologisation of rapid ejaculation arises when this evolutionary conservation encounters modern culture.
Key point:
By superimposing socio-cultural expectations of prolonged penetrative endurance onto a biological system designed for rapid efficiency, 20th-century medicine transformed an evolutionary adaptation into a clinical disorder (Tiefer, 2004; Waldinger, 2014).
Historic Social Trends in Sexuality and Gender
Furthermore, the transition from viewing sexuality as a fluid, communal, or natural phenomenon to a highly regulated, mechanical function is intrinsically linked to the political and economic evolution of Western society (Bowers 2020; Foucault, 1978; Rubin, 1984).
Tracing the historiography of sexual regulation from the Middle Ages through the modern era reveals that current norms regarding monogamy, relationship structure, and sexual performance were shaped heavily by imperatives of statecraft, governance, and capital accumulation (Bowers 2001; Bowers 2020; Coontz, 2005; Federici, 2004).
In pre-industrial Europe, sexual expression retained degrees of local variation and pagan residual influence (Federici, 2004). As feudalism shifted toward early mercantile capitalism, civic and religious authorities increasingly sought to enclose both land and bodies. The enforcement of strict monogamous marriage emerged not purely as a theological doctrine, but as an economic technology designed to regulate land inheritance, consolidate wealth, and track lineage (Coontz, 2005).
Protestant theology, aligned with emerging administrative states in the 16th and 17th centuries, elevated the marital unit as the foundational cell of social order (Bowers 2020; Coontz, 2005). Non-procreative sexual expression, non-monogamous arrangements, and same-sex intimacy were systematically criminalized.
Sexual pleasure divorced from reproductive utility was framed as an existential threat to societal stability and economic productivity (Foucault, 1978; Rubin, 1984). During the Industrial Revolution, demands for a mobile workforce dismantled extended kinship networks, codifying the isolated nuclear family and legal monogamy as tools for labor reproduction and economic organization (D'Emilio, 1983).
Decolonising Sexological and Gendered Trends
The Eurocentric model of sexology is further limited by its reliance on a materialistic, performative paradigm that evaluates sexual health almost exclusively through mechanics, erection quality, and penetrative capacity (Morgensen, 2011; Tiefer, 2004).
Key point:
The window outward reveals a much expanded perspective on human ecology. Decolonizing this limited perspective that diminishes the evolutionary and expansive spectrum of human intimacy and sexual pleasure to a mechanistic industrial window requires engaging Indigenous sexologies that have historically conceptualized human intimacy beyond Euro-American binaries and mechanical metrics (Hunt, 2016; Robinson, 2020).
In many First Nations traditions—such as Mi'kmaq Two-Spirit frameworks—sexuality and gender expression are understood as holistic, relational, and deeply integrated into the spiritual and ecological life of the community (Bowers 2019; Hunt, 2016; Sylliboy et al., 2021). Indigenous frameworks privilege relational attunement, sacred reciprocity, and communal balance over individual physical performance, recognizing a wide spectrum of erotic connection, sensual presence, and non-penetrative intimacy as fully realized expressions of human eroticism (Bowers 2019; Hunt, 2016; Robinson, 2020).
Section 2: Critique of Mechanistic Sexology & The Interoceptive Turn
The dominant clinical frameworks governing contemporary sexology rely heavily on a biomedical, diagnostic paradigm (APA, 2022; World Health Organization [WHO], 2019). By reducing the rich, subjective spectrum of human intimacy to quantifiable physical reflexes and temporal benchmarks, mainstream manuals frequently mistake physiological variation for clinical pathology.
Modern clinical sexology remains largely anchored in late 20th-century diagnostic traditions that sought to legitimate the field by adopting medicalized, performance-based metrics (Tiefer, 2004). This diagnostic materialism is explicitly exemplified in standard treatment protocols for ejaculatory concerns, where clinical distress is measured against stopwatch metrics such as Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) (Althof, 2020; Waldinger, 2014).
Limits of Diagnostic Materialism
Under frameworks such as the DSM-5-TR and ICD-11, premature ejaculation is defined primarily by short latency (typically under one minute), a perceived inability to delay ejaculation, and associated personal distress (APA, 2022; WHO, 2019). While these criteria offer a standardized window for clinical trials, they construct a deeply reductive model.
Diagnostic materialism treats the male body as a hydraulic system governed by mechanical thresholds of control, ignoring the fluid, state-dependent nature of the autonomic nervous system. By establishing arbitrary temporal benchmarks, medical sexology creates a self-fulfilling diagnostic loop: the act of timing copulation introduces cognitive monitoring and performance anxiety, which directly triggers sympathetic nervous system dominance—thereby accelerating the ejaculatory reflex.
Pharmacological and mechanical interventions (such as local anesthetics or squeeze techniques) focus on dulling physical sensation, actively enforcing somatic dissociation as a substitute for genuine erotic regulation (Althof, 2020).
This mechanistic reduction is reinforced by pervasive cultural scripts and structural gaps in social education. Chief among these is the persistent coital imperative—the culturally embedded assumption that "real" sex consists exclusively of penile penetration ending in male ejaculation (McPhillips et al., 2001; Zilbergeld, 1999).
Failure of Educational Systems
Formal sex education across Western jurisdictions remains predominantly risk-averse, focusing on reproduction and disease prevention while excluding pleasure literacy, somatic self-regulation, and relational communication (Fine, 1988; Haberland, 2015).
Furthermore, dominant constructions of masculinity demand emotional stoicism and sexual hyper-competence (Mahalik et al., 2003). In this educational vacuum, commercial pornography becomes the primary source of sexual socialization, projecting edited scripts centered on immediate erection and explosive finishes (Sun et al., 2016).
Internalised Limitations - Facing Sexual Health Problems
The history does not line up to being terribly helpful for men and women and non-binary souls seeking a way forward. Where would we turn for inspiration, and to address the problems felt by existing limited frames?
When men replicate these limited and also recommended scripts from mainstream medicalised and mechanistic approaches, men often engage in more intensive and enduring spectatoring—anxious self-observation that triggers sympathetic arousal and precipitates performance failure (Barlow, 1986; Masters & Johnson, 1970). This makes the problem worse, not better. It traps men into the cycle of dissociation from embodied wellness leading to rapid copulation.
Key point:
To break free from these diagnostic and cultural traps, sexology must undergo an interoceptive turn.
The term interoception derives from the Latin interus ("internal") and capere ("to receive or hold"), signaling two core clinical metaphors: interiority (turning attention inward away from spectatoring) and receptivity (the capacity to contain somatic signals without panic or forced outcomes).
The Interoceptive Turn
Neurobiologically, interoception refers to the sensory system by which the brain maps and interprets physiological signals originating within the body, processed primarily through the insular cortex (Craig, 2002, 2003). Interoception is the primary biological driver of homeostasis—the body's effort to maintain internal equilibrium (Craig, 2003).
In a sexual context, ejaculatory inevitability can be understood as an unmapped homeostatic breakdown. When a man lacks interoceptive accuracy, he remains blind to subtle shifts in muscle tension, pelvic floor tone, and autonomic arousal preceding the ejaculatory threshold.
Key point:
Developing interoceptive literacy allows men to engage in somatic pacing: recognizing early physiological indicators of escalating sympathetic tone, utilizing deep diaphragmatic breathing to restore parasympathetic balance, and expanding their capacity to hold high erotic energy without immediate discharge (Brotto, 2018; Garfinkel et al., 2015).
Section 3: Neuropsychosocial Pathways & Ericksonian Psychobiology
Translating neuro-somatic theory into practical clinical change requires a methodology capable of reshaping sub-cortical responses. Standard cognitive-behavioral approaches often fail because they attempt to address autonomic responses through conscious, intellectual control (Barlow, 1986; Tiefer, 2004).
Key point:
By integrating Polyvagal Theory (Porges, 2011) with Ericksonian hypnotherapy (Erickson & Rossi, 1979; Rossi, 2002) and Neuro-Linguistic Psychotherapy (NLP) (Dilts, 1990; Wake, 2008), clinicians gain a robust framework for re-patterning state-dependent anxiety into parasympathetic flow.
The human autonomic nervous system operates across distinct physiological states that dictate sexual response and relational capacity (Porges, 2011, 2017). Under conditions of threat or performance anxiety, the nervous system shifts into sympathetic mobilization. In ancestral environments, this state prioritized immediate survival and rapid genetic transmission (Barash & Lipton, 2002; Gallup et al., 2016).
Working with the Body-Mind for a Change
In contemporary sexual settings, when a man experiences performance anxiety, his sympathetic system misinterprets cognitive judgment as environmental danger, accelerating the spinal ejaculatory reflex loop (Barlow, 1986).
Key point:
Conversely, the ventral vagal circuit (the mammalian parasympathetic system) mediates social engagement, safety, and emotional co-regulation (Porges, 2011, 2017). Within this state, the body can access proto-evolutionary goals: relaxation, kinship, co-mingling, and the expansion of interoceptive awareness toward transpersonal growth (Gilligan, 1987; Rossi, 2002).
Milton H. Erickson defined hypnotic trance not as an artificial state of sleep, but as a natural, inwardly focused state of heightened interoceptive awareness (Erickson & Rossi, 1979; Gilligan, 1987). We demonstrated how this mechanism of internal state adjustment assists with sexuality and gender diverse cases (Bowers 2003).
Moving to Integral Holistic Psychotherapy
While mainstream sex therapy relies on cognitive distraction techniques that exacerbate somatic dissociation (Althof, 2020), Ericksonian trance guides focal attention inward toward sub-cortical visceral sensations. Building on Erickson's legacy, Ernest Rossi (1986/1993, 2002) demonstrated that therapeutic trance operates along natural ultradian rhythms, influencing neural plasticity and autonomic regulation at the cellular level.
Key point:
Hypnotic utilization allows clinicians to bypass conscious performance expectations and address State-Dependent Memory and Learning (SDML). Sexual anxieties are typically state-dependent memories anchored during past moments of failure or shame; trance provides a safe state of consciousness where these memories can be re-synthesized into experiences of competence and ease (Rossi, 1986/1993).
With Neuro-Linguistic Sexological Re-mapping
Neuro-Linguistic Psychotherapy extends these principles by providing tools to map and restructure the internal sensory representations (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) that drive performance anxiety (Bandler & Grinder, 1979; Dilts, 1990; Wake, 2008). In NLP, performance anxiety operates as an automated loop: an internal visual image of partner judgment or a negative auditory dialogue triggers a kinesthetic response of pelvic clamping and thoracic breathing, precipitating rapid ejaculation.
NLP state management allows clients to collapse these anxiety anchors by pairing the triggering context with kinesthetic resources of safety and relaxation (Dilts, 1990; Wake, 2008). Furthermore, when clients spectator, they construct an internal visual image from an external, third-person perspective.
Therapists using these specific psychotherapeutic techniques can guide clients to alter these sub-modalities—shifting from an external view to an associated, first-person kinesthetic awareness centered in the core of the body, thereby restoring parasympathetic flow (Wake, 2008).
Section 4: Holistic & Transpersonal Growth Vectors
When clinical sexology frees itself from diagnostic materialism, it moves beyond symptom management toward the expansion of human potential. The ultimate objective of an affirmative, decolonized psychosexual therapy is to facilitate somatic integration, ecstatic capacity, and transpersonal relational growth.
A foundational error of 20th-century sexology was the assumption that male ejaculation and orgasm are physiologically identical and mechanically inseparable (Althof, 2020; Masters & Johnson, 1966). Contemporary neurobiology confirms that they are mediated by distinct neural pathways (Coolen et al., 2004; Komisaruk et al., 2006).
Spinal Reflex Loops, and Tracking Responses
Ejaculation is a spinal reflex loop governed by lumbar spinothalamic (LSt) generator cells located within the L3–L5 spinal segments, operating under sympathetic control (Coolen et al., 2004). In contrast, orgasm is a complex cerebral, neuro-chemical, and visceral phenomenon involving cortical activation, insular mapping, and systemic oxytocin release (Craig, 2009; Komisaruk et al., 2006).
Post-ejaculatory exhaustion is driven by prolactin surges and sympathetic tone resets following spinal ejection (Coolen et al., 2004). Because orgasm occurs in the central nervous system rather than the spinal reflex loop, the male body exhibits high somatic plasticity.
Key point:
Through interoceptive training and parasympathetic breathing, men can experience full-bodied orgasmic states ("valley orgasms") while remaining below the LSt ejaculatory threshold (Komisaruk et al., 2006).
The Parasympathetic Turn as Gateway to Pleasure
Decoupling subjective peak from spinal ejection bypasses prolactin-driven refractory shutdown, expanding the male somatic container for multi-orgasmic potential. Did you get that? Funny how language hides so much, especially when we use fancy words.
Let’s offer the same in different words to make sure we get the point. By tracking how to get to know and ulitise your parasympathic nervous system, male bodies are tuned already to enable and nurture non-ejactulatory pleasure (and big secret: non-ejactulatory orgasms). The implications: multiple internal non-ejactulatory orgasms are possible.
(A Gateway Hidden by Centuries of Projection)
This track has been clearly laid out in historic documents like in eastern Tanta - and for centuries. From my view of western cultural studies, the bread crumbs are also evident even in the deeply Christian mystical traditions since the early Church and particularly during the medieval and late medieval ears. In an ironic turn, the height of Christian political dominance and then the reformation and protestant reactivity in puritanism were further confirmations of this deeply sexual phobia that emerged culturally-wide.
Understanding the socio-economic and political power relations is one level yes. But here I am revealing the deeper emotive and psycho-social and relational vectors of projection, fear and reactivity against human gender and sexual diversity. The very reason this is so compelling is because of how central and integral to our humanity are diversity in gendered and sexuality expressions.
Yes of course, contemporary science usually legs way behind. But when we lay out the field as we do here in this paper, you will see that the wider sciences and sociological and psychological literatures converge toward this vector - it becomes reasonable to put the pieces of the puzzle together.
Parasympathetic and Transpersonal… Wow…
To contextualize this somatic plasticity, sexology benefits from Ken Wilber's (2000) Integral Theory and transpersonal psychology, which map development across pre-personal (instinctual/reflexive), personal (egoic/performative), and transpersonal (un-itive/ecstatic) waves of consciousness.
When sexology restricts itself to fixing "dysfunction," it traps clients in the performative stage—demanding that the ego successfully command the physical machine (Tiefer, 2004). A transpersonal framework reframes sexual energy (Eros) as an evolutionary driver toward connection and self-transcendence (Wilber, 2000).
Key point:
As performative anxiety drops away, the individual enters psychological flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990)—a state of deep presence where ego dissolution and heightened somatic bliss occur naturally. In these high-attunement states, sexual intimacy shifts from self-focused release to relational communion, cultivating empathy and an altruistic desire for mutual fulfillment (Bowers 2010; Hunt, 2016; Sylliboy et al., 2021).
An Unexpected Gateway to Sacred Sexuality
Likewise, our human innate somatic awareness provides gateways to sacred sexuality which mirror the transpersonal literature and age old cultural and indigenous models of human sexual agency (Bowers 2003a). Indigenous analysis suggests these factors are more readily part of the cosmology of non-western societies, ironically leading to deepening of appreciation for communicative erotic states within kinship models of relationality (Bowers 2005, 2007, 2008).
But also so fascinating when you track my whole career over about 40 years now - you see this analysis and critique of western mainstream limitations leading toward this central apex of discovery. You realise that we were on track from the very beginning.
The western story from 2000 years ago, to the middle ages and during the 1200s to 1400s in particular, and the rest of the story as it unfolded until about the 1970s - was a narrative of projection, denial, and frankly a grappling with the complexity of human gendered and sexual capacities. These have always been woven into our evolutionary biology. But they got caught up in the sociopoitical, economic and power grab of social change. Minority politics is because of this very problem that is today being debated by science and health. The nature of human sexual and gender agency is at play. The very heart of sacred sexuality is under examination - even if the field has not woken up from the illusive western dreamstate as yet.
Sad that science and health often fail so much, when people really just need a hand up. To find that help, we need to track through this mess of jungles and seek out the oasis of human agency untainted by conflict and projection.
The Sacred is Often Hidden from View
In many ways we are excited by this turn of events. It points me back to why I started in this career so long ago. My reason was this hope in humanity and this love for people, this deep innate empathy and vision of our connecting story. The power of our Sacred Medicine in narratives of healing. Our humanity was the energy and flow of my vision.
So it seems terribly ironic to me that western cultural evolution has literally destroyed by pulling apart every shred of human agency and meaning, covered it up and buried it by warped Christian beliefs that were re-rendered into political gendered ideologies and sexual codes of conduct. These were literally policed by priests and state systems for centuries. Countless people were burned at the stake, and after the burning times laws continued to use torture and prisons to stake fear in the heart of men and women and non-binary souls.
Yet the western story is that we today, in our generations, and in the future as this unfolds, we are part of an awakening. A sacred story is unfolding. And that trajectory is based on a more solid objective scientific and psychological footing. Yes, this paper shows the foothold can be tricky and misguided at times. But that is part of the scientific conversation, which is based on hypothesis and then testing and debate and seeking proof of theory. Sexology is in its early days of this process unfolding.
Peer-Led Somatic and Social Movements
For any model to function the holistic psychosexual model must extend into the social sphere - must be practical as well as point to the deep meaning of sacred sexuality. The widespread prevalence of performance anxiety among men is directly linked to social isolation and the lack of authentic peer learning spaces (Mahalik et al., 2003; Zilbergeld, 1999). While proactive and integral therapy may be rare these days, peer-led approaches are taking up the slack to some extent. But these trends are not well known, and may not extend easily into rural and remote Australia.
Contemporary Australian peer-led somatic movements—such as the Institute of Somatic Sexology—have pioneered experiential, de-pathologized approaches that combine bodywork, mindfulness, and movement. Part of building communal erotic literacy involves deconstructing the compulsory monogamous nuclear model as the sole container for intimacy (Barker & Langdridge, 2010; Coontz, 2005).
Contemporary movements toward Consensual Non-Monogamy (CNM) and expanded kinship networks represent a natural socio-historical adaptation to this rigid history (Barker & Langdridge, 2010; Federici, 2004).
Key point:
In relationally fluid and somatic peer environments, sexual connection is liberated from the mandate of penetration, prioritising radical transparency, boundary negotiation, and emotional safety—direct facilitators of ventral vagal social engagement and embodied presence (Porges, 2011).
Conclusion
We have taken a long and winding road from centuries of human social and sexual evolution to a contemporary place that is highly questionable and entirely suspect. But you know what, we need self-compassion for this as well.
Western society is in its infancy still - in a prepubescent phase of temper tantrums and egoic rationality. We have only just grown up from the industrial revolution to be thrown into the technological revolution - and gods help us with the AI revolution ahead.
From a First Nation’s perspective, western society has always been seen as infant-like vulnerability. And no wonder the Elders since the 1600s were warning about destruction of the environment and the massive risks to human survival on this planet - from the first days of cutting down the virgin forests in eastern Canada. They knew, and we still know.
Human gender and sexuality identity are such deep and complex areas of exploration and study. Our survey of First Nations Two Spirit traditions made this abundantly clear.
Elder Daniel Paul’s summary still comes to mind. He told me once that any society that would actively promote the violence and harm that is regularly caused by the mainstream society and by Christian churches toward homosexuals, is not a society at all but a pack of insects driven by primal destructive impulses and hunger for power. His analysis of the colonial history is very powerful and full of deep wisdom and truth (Paul 2022).
So how can we reasonably expect a field like contemporary sexology, also in its infancy, to get human psychospiritual phenomena right? Well, we can’t. Simple as that.
But the path is laid out - there are options for those of us who are full of adventure and curiosity.
References
Althof, S. E. (2020). Treatment of premature ejaculation: Psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and combined therapy. In Y. M. Binik & K. S. Hall (Eds.), Principles and practice of sex therapy (6th ed., pp. 118–135). The Guilford Press.
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs into princes: Neuro-linguistic programming. Real People Press.
Barash, D. P., & Lipton, J. E. (2002). The myth of monogamy: Fidelity and infidelity in animals and people. Henry Holt and Company.
Barker, M., & Langdridge, D. (2010). Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge.
Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.2.140
Bowers R. and Minichiello V. (2001) A review of homosexuality: Changes over time, In Wood C. (Ed.), Sexual Positions: An Australian view, Hill of Content, Melbourne.
Bowers R. (2003) Semi-hypnotic visualisation: Treating internalised homophobia in sexual and gender minorities. In Whitman J. and Boyd C., The therapist’s notebook for lesbian, gay and bisexual clients: Homework, handouts, and activities for use in psychotherapy, Haworth Press, NY.
Bowers R. (2003a) Queer Space: Empowering realisations of sacred sexuality, In Whitman J. and Boyd C., The therapist’s notebook for lesbian, gay and bisexual clients: Homework, handouts, and activities for use in psychotherapy, Haworth Press, NY.
Bowers R. (2005) Our stories, our medicine – Exploring holistic therapy integrating body-wellness, mindfulness, and spirituality: An Indigenous perspective on healing, change, and counselling, and the social and political contexts of an emerging discipline, Counselling Australia, 4(4), 114-117.
Bowers R. (2007) Diversity in creation: Identity, race, sexuality and Indigenous creativity, International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, 7(1), 3-7.
Bowers R. (2008) Counsellor education as humanist colonialism: Seeking post-colonial approaches to educating counsellors by exploring pathways to an Indigenous aesthetic, Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37, 71-79
Bowers R. (2010) Identity, prejudice, and healing in Aboriginal circles: Models of identity, embodiment, and ecology of place as traditional medicine for education and counselling – A Mi’kmaq First Nation perspective, AlterNative – International Journal of Indigenous Studies, 6(3), 203-221.
Bowers J.R. (2019) Mi’kmaq Puoinaq Two Spirit Medicine: Sexuality and Gender Variance, Spirituality and Culture, Ability Therapy Specialists Pty Ltd, Armidale.
Bowers J.R. (2020) Homophobia and Healing: Psychotherapy and the Psychology of Prejudice, Ability Therapy Specialists Pty Ltd, Armidale.
Brotto, L. A. (2018). Better sex through mindfulness: How women can reclaim their pleasure. Greystone Books.
Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: How love conquered marriage. Viking Penguin.
Coolen, L. M., Allard, J., Truitt, W. A., & McKenna, K. E. (2004). Central regulation of ejaculation. Physiology & Behavior, 83(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.08.023
Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn894
Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00090-4
Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2555
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
D'Emilio, J. (1983). Capitalism and gay identity. In A. Snitow, C. Stansell, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Powers of desire: The politics of sexuality (pp. 100–113). Monthly Review Press.
Dilts, R. B. (1990). Changing belief systems with NLP. Meta Publications.
Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (1979). Hypnotherapy: An exploratory casebook. Irvington Publishers.
Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation. Autonomedia.
Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.1.u043001378518234
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
Gallup, G. G., Ampel, B. C., Wedberg, N., & Pogossova, A. (2016). Do women control the time course of human copulation? Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000049
Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive sensibility. Biological Psychology, 104, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004
Gilligan, S. G. (1987). Therapeutic trances: The cooperation principle in Ericksonian hypnotherapy. Brunner/Mazel.
Haberland, N. A. (2015). The case for addressing gender and power in sexuality and HIV education: A comprehensive review of evaluation studies. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1363/4103115
Hunt, S. (2016). An introduction to the health of Two-Spirit people: Historical, contemporary and emergent issues. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health, 1–32.
Komisaruk, B. R., Wise, N., Frangos, E., Liu, W. C., Allen, K., & Brody, S. (2006). Women's clitoral and vaginal orgasms activate different areas of the sensory cortex. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 3(S1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00242.x
Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI). Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3
Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. Little, Brown and Company.
Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy. Little, Brown and Company.
McPhillips, K., Braun, V., & Gavey, N. (2001). Defining normal sexual behaviour: A discourse analysis of sexuality texts. Australian Psychologist, 36(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060108259656
Morgensen, S. L. (2011). Spaces between us: Queer settler colonialism and Indigenous decolonization. University of Minnesota Press.
Paul, D. (2022) We were not the savages, First Nations history: The collision between European and Native American civilisations, Fernwood Publishing, Halifax.
Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.
Porges, S. W. (2017). The pocket guide to the polyvagal theory: The transformative power of feeling safe. W. W. Norton & Company.
Robinson, M. (2020). Two-Spirit identity in a time of gender variance. Journal of Homosexuality, 67(12), 1690–1708. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1613853
Rossi, E. L. (1993). The psychobiology of mind-body healing: New concepts of therapeutic hypnosis (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1986)
Rossi, E. L. (2002). The psychobiology of gene expression: Neuroscience and neurogenesis in hypnosis and the healing arts. W. W. Norton & Company.
Rubin, G. S. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sun, C., Bridges, A., Johnson, J. A., & Ezzell, M. B. (2016). Pornography and the male sexual script: An analysis of consumption and internalization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(4), 983–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0591-2
Sylliboy, J. R., Paul, W., Sylliboy, A., & Hughes, J. (2021). L'nuwey Tplutaqan and Two-Spirit wellness: Mi'kmaq perspectives on gender, sexuality, and community health. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 16(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.32799/ijih.v16i2.33210
Tiefer, L. (2004). Sex is not a natural act & other essays (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
Wake, L. (2008). Neurolinguistic psychotherapy: A posture of mystery. Routledge.
Waldinger, M. D. (2007). Premature ejaculation: Definition and drug treatment. Drugs, 67(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200767040-00005
Waldinger, M. D. (2014). Premature ejaculation: State of the art. Urologic Clinics of North America, 41(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/ucl.2013.08.006
Wilber, K. (2000). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution (2nd ed.). Shambhala Publications.
World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.; ICD-11). World Health Organization. https://icd.who.int/
Zilbergeld, B. (1999). The new male sexuality (Rev. ed.). Bantam Books.